• Conferences Calendar
  • Abstract Books
  • Proceedings
  • Proofreading - Editing
Global Conference on Business, Economics, Management and Tourism

2014 I 2015 2016 I 2017 I 2018  

World Conference on Psychology Sciences

2014 I 2015 I 2016 I 2017 I 2019

World Conference on Educational Researches

 2015 I 2016 I 2017 I 2018 I 2019

Global Conference on Computer Science, Software, Networks and Engineering
2014 - 2015 I 2017 I 2019
World Conference on Information Technology

 2015 I 2016 I 2017 I 2018

World Conference on Big Data

2014 I 2015 I 2016 I 2018

 
Cyprus International Conference on Educational Research

2015 I 2016 I 2017 I 2018 I 2019

World Conference on Educational Sciences

2015 I 2016 I 2017 I 2018 I 2019

World Congress of Administrative and Political Sciences

2014 I 2015 I 2016 I 2017 I 2018

 
World Conference on Design and Arts

2015 I 2016 I 2017 I 2018 I 2019

Global Conference on Energy, Soil, Water, Air & Environment

2014 I 2015 I 2016 I 2017 I 2018

International Conference on Business, Finance and Administrative Sciences

2014 I 2015 I 2017 I 2018

 
Global Conference on Materials Sciences

2014 I 2015 I 2017 I 2019

Global Conference on Environmental Studies

2014 I 2015 I 2017 I 2018

World Conference on Innovation and Computer Science

 2015 I 2016 I  2017 I 2018 I 2019

 
Global Conference on Psychology Researches

2014 I 2015 I 2017 I 2018

World Conference on Business, Economics and Management

 2015  I 2017 I 2018 I 2019

International Congress on Nursing

2017 I 2018 2019

 
Global Conference on Contemporary Issues in Education

2015 I 2016 I 2017 I 2018

International Conference on Education

2015 I 2016 I Abstarcts Book 2017 I 2018 I 2019

International Congress of Special Education 

2017 I 2018 I 2019

 
World Conference on Health Sciences

2014 I 2015 I 2016 I 2017 I 2018

World Conference on Psychology, Counseling and Guidance

2015 I 2016 ı 2017 I 2018 I 2019

World Conference on Learning, Teaching and Educational Leadership

2014 I 2015  2016 I Abstracts Book 2017 I 2018

 
Global Conference on Linguistics and Foreign Language Teaching

2014 I 2015 I 2016 I 2017 I 2018 I 2019

World Conference on Psychology and Sociology

2014 I 2015 I 2016 I 2017 I 2018

World Conference on Science and Mathematics Education

2014 I 2015 I 2017 I 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences iis an electronic product focusing entirely on publishing high quality selected conference proceedings. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences enables fast dissemination so conference delegates can publish their papers in a dedicated open access online issue, which is then made freely available worldwide.

Click here for more issue.


New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Advances in Pure and Applied Sciences is a multi-dimensional journal which covers all aspects of scientific and technical disciplines including pure and applied sciences, health, environmental and material sciences, applied natural sciences including physics, chemistry and biology, application of scientific inventions for medical purposes, advances in technology, computer science and communication technology. This journal serves as a platform that fosters new applications for all scientists engaged in research and development in these fast growing fields in an international arena.

Click here for more issue.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click here for more information.

Awer-Center
×

Message

Failed loading XML... Extra content at the end of the document

Submit your article for proofreading.

Proofreading Form
Name(*)
Email(*)
Message(*)
Number of Words(*)
Upload Article


Do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions. Looking forward to be of service, we remain.

The Academic Events Group (TAEG-Center) Contact

Pembe Mehmet

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Postal Address:

P.O. 22912,1525

Nicosia, Cyprus

Contact Form
Name(*)
Email(*)
Message(*)



Becoming a reviewer for TAEG Journals

How to become a reviewer ?

Reviewers play a central role in scholarly publishing. Reviewing is a time-intensive process and requires certain skills in a specific field. Before you decide if you want to become a reviewer, we recommend you to be sure that you would be able to allocate time for the reviewing process. Through taking part in a review process, you would ensure certain standards of the scientific process and help to maintain and increase the quality of the journal. Besides, you would establish relationships with prestigious academicians and researchers.

If you think you would like to be a reviewer for a specific journal published by TAEG ,  you can always contact with one of the journal's editors found in the journal’s homepages. You should primarily follow these steps;

Determine which journal you would like to be a reviewer from this link: http://www.taeg-center.org/journals.htm Go to the journal homepage and register. Please keep in mind that all required fields in the forms must be completed. Please send an e-mail to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. including your current CV, contact information, academic rank, affiliation, country, area of expertise, at least 5 keywords related with your area of expertise and how many papers you will be able to review in a year. Editorial board of the related journal will return to you about your request.

Note: Reviewers will get 4 Euros (5$) discount for every paper that they reviewed. These discounts will be applied for conference participations organized by TAEG.

 

What is peer review?

TAEG relies on the peer review process to ensure the quality and validity of individual articles and the journals that publish them. All journals published by TAEG are subjected to Double Blind Peer-Review. Both the reviewer and the author are anonymous in Double Blind Review in order to prevent any reviewer bias. Reviewers are required to complete their reviews within 40 days.

Guidance for peer reviewers

Reviewers evaluate article submissions for specific journals based on the requirements of that journal, predefined criteria, and quality, completeness and accuracy of the article. They provide feedback on the article and the research, suggest improvements and make a recommendation to the editor about whether to accept, reject or request changes to the article.

If you accept to take part in the review process of an article,  you must treat the article you receive as a confidential document. This means you are not allowed to share them with anyone.

First read the article and then take a break from it, giving you time to think. Consider the article from your own perspective. You should make sure you know what the journal is looking for, and have a copy of any specific reviewing criteria you need to consider.

Your review will help the editor to decide whether or not to publish the article. Giving your overall opinion and general observations of the article is essential. Your comments should be courteous and constructive, and should not include any personal remarks or personal details including your name.

During the reviewing process, you should mainly consider the following basic questions:

Is the article important for the related field?

Will the article contribute to existing knowledge in the related field? Does the article make sense and have a clear message? Is the research question clearly defined and appropriately answered? Does the article have an appropriate and adequate design and method to answer the research question? Does the article adequately describe the participants adequately? Did the study adhere to the ethical principles and standards? Do the results answer the research question in a clear way? Are the interpretation and conclusions derived the data presented and discussed in the light of previous evidence? Are the references used in the article current and relevant? Does the abstract reflect accurately what the paper is about?

When you make a recommendation, it is worth considering the categories the editor mostly uses for classifying the article:

Reject (explain the reason in review form) Accept without revision Revise – either major or minor (explain the revision that is required, and indicate to the editor whether or not you would be happy to review the revised article)

If you suspect plagiarism, fraud or other ethical issues, share your suspicions with the editor, providing as much detail as possible. Visit TAEG's Ethics site or the COPE Guidelines for more information (http://www.taeg-center.org/index.php/about-us-2/publication-ethics).




SOCIAL NETWORKS

     

MAIN SPONSORS

  

  

Web of Science

will be announced

9006147
Today
Yesterday
This Week
This Month
Last Month
All days
1113
1791
6331
17263
14113
9006147